Uncategorized

  • 6 months...

    it'll be 6 months soon.(well, in another month or so)
    i'm starting to feel .......nervous?..  unsure?.....
    what's wrong with me?
    why is a long term relationship so hard?
    why is it that my heart longs for love, for a lasting relationship...
    yet i always feel the need to leave, the desire to escape, the fear of committment?
    he's great... the sweetest i've ever had...
    but....
    .......

    we'll see, i guess.

  • CNN article: Your $25 can start a business, change a life

    By Jen Haley
    CNN

    (CNN)
    -- Lovisa Asinde is a Ugandan widow who supports herself and her five
    children selling food. She started the small business eight years ago,
    and planned to open a larger restaurant in the center of her town.

    art.asinde.jpg

    Lovisa Asinde of Uganda was able to fund her restaurant business with the help of foreign investors.

    But when one of her children fell ill she was unable to work, and she
    lacked the $500 needed to buy saucepans, plates and food staples.

    So, strange as it may seem, Asinde went looking for international investors. She found several.

    New Yorker Bill Gilroy invested $100 in her business along with eight other investors from as far away as the Netherlands.

    Gilroy has never met Asinde. In fact, all he knows about her he found on Kiva.org -- a Web site that connects entrepreneurs in developing nations to investors in the United States and abroad.

    This is microfinancing. It allows everyday people to invest as little
    as $25 to help people in developing countries climb out of poverty.
    The concept of microfinancing is nothing new. At its essence, it's
    making small loans to the working poor. The loans are used to establish
    or expand small businesses to help families earn more money.

    The
    industry's assets total about $34 billion, according to Microfinance
    Information Exchange, and there are as many as 10,000 microfinancing
    institutions -- known as MFIs -- around the world, according to
    Microcredit Summit Campaign, a coalition of advocates, donor agencies
    and educational institutions. Some of the industry's contributors
    include Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, TIAA-CREF and J.P. Morgan.

    Premal Shah founded Kiva three years ago. The Web site posts profiles of entrepreneurs from 80 countries looking to start a business.
    Visitors can click through the pictures and personal stories to choose
    the business they want to fund, whether it's a dairy farmer in Bolivia
    or a young woman in Peru who wants to open a grocery store.

    The entrepreneur generally repays the loan within six months to a year,
    the company says. During repayment, investors can see individual
    progress reports as they are posted to the site.

    The investor doesn't receive interest on the money, but Shah says Kiva lenders usually don't want to earn a rate of return.

    With MicroPlace, on the other hand, people loan money to the working
    poor through the Internet and receive a small amount of interest.

    Lenders for the eBay-owned MicroPlace purchase securities instead of
    funding individual cases. The money generated by these sales is
    invested in microfinance institutions around the world. These
    microfinance institutions, in turn, find the entrepreneurs, make loans
    and collect payments. Most loans are paid off, with interest, within
    one to four years, according to MicroPlace founder Tracey Turner.

    Contrary to expectations, repayment rates for microfinancing are high:
    Kiva's repayment rate is about 97.2 percent, according to Shah, and
    Turner says the historic repayment rate on microfinance loans in
    general has averaged 97 percent.

    That's because people respect their obligations, says Peter Hall, the director of the Microfinance Information Exchange.

    "It's not a society where people are very mobile. It's very
    family-based, community based. People aren't flight risks. They are
    grounded in a certain time and place. They do everything they can to
    improve their place in society," he says.

    That's not to say there aren't challenges to microfinancing.

    "The reality is that 80 percent of poor don't have access to
    microfinance," says Shah. "It costs a lot of money to go out and serve
    the poor. Banks are risk-averse institutions," he says.

    As a result, interest rates on microfinance loans can be anywhere from 18 to 60 percent.

    Some people argue that poor borrowers are more conservative in their
    loans, avoiding risks such as investing in new technology or expanding
    the workforce. And it's exactly these risks that turn profits.

    Microfinancing also presents cultural challenges.

    For example, there is a great reluctance for Afghan women to pose in
    pictures, and in Iraq, photos are blurred for security reasons.

    But some problems can lead to cultural lessons.

    Shah relates the story of a Cambodian woman who wanted a loan so she
    could start a spinach farm. Once she got the money, she used it for her
    daughter's wedding. The loan officer noted this on the site. Of course,
    investors were enraged. But that was only until they were told that
    weddings are one of the most important events in that culture.

    Neither Shah nor Turner view microfinancing as a cure-all for global poverty.

    "It can only help the working poor who are self-employed,
    entrepreneurial and want to improve their lives. There are many people
    in the world who are poor but do not fit this definition," says Turner.

    But in the meantime, sites like Kiva.org and MicroPlace.com are helping to connect people all over the world in a common goal.

    "I'm always on the Internet," says Gilroy. "I have disposable cash and
    it's rewarding; to put 100 bucks out there with a commitment on the
    other end. It's not like you're throwing money over the wall. It comes
    back to you. There is a sense of every little bit you do, helps," he
    says.

    And in fact, Gilroy got his money back from his loan, in full.

    Asinde succeeded in her mission. She bought furniture, saucepans,
    plates and new ladles. The loan also afforded her chicken, fish and
    passion fruit, in addition to a kitchen renovation. According to a
    journal update, her children are attending school and the restaurant is
    becoming well-known in the community.

    "For years I have been
    selling cooked food through thick and thin," Asinde writes on her Kiva
    profile. "I struggled to look after my family. I thank God for the loan
    money you gave me. The people are now served according to their
    preferences unlike before when I used to sell only posho and beans."

    Microfinancing is on track to help 100 million people this year,
    according to the Microcredit Summit Campaign. But no matter how large
    the field becomes, Shah says there is one simple thing to keep in mind.

    "It's people helping people," he says. "That's a powerful concept."

  • 2 more inches...

    then i can donate my hair...

    Locks of Love is a public non-profit organization that provides
    hairpieces to financially disadvantaged children under age 18 suffering
    from long-term medical hair loss from any diagnosis. We meet a unique
    need for children by using donated hair to create the highest quality
    hair prosthetics.

    Wanna donate too?

  • Google Sky

    "Traveling to the stars has never been easier.

    To help you explore the far reaches of our universe, we have teamed up
    with astronomers at some of the largest observatories in the world to
    bring you a new view of the sky. Using Google Maps this tool provides
    an exciting way to browse and explore the universe. You can find the
    positions of the planets and constellations on the sky and even
    watching the birth of distant galaxies as seen by the Hubble Space
    Telescope."

    http://www.google.com/sky/

    value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gX9MeF2Au9c&hl=en"> name="wmode" value="transparent"> src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gX9MeF2Au9c&hl=en"
    type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="208"
    width="250">

  • The Clean Energy Scam

    "This land rush is being accelerated by an unlikely source: biofuels.
    An explosion in demand for farm-grown fuels has raised global crop
    prices to record highs, which is spurring a dramatic expansion of
    Brazilian agriculture, which is invading the Amazon at an increasingly
    alarming rate.

    Propelled by mounting anxieties over soaring oil
    costs and climate change, biofuels have become the vanguard of the
    green-tech revolution, the trendy way for politicians and corporations
    to show they're serious about finding alternative sources of energy and
    in the process slowing global warming. The U.S. quintupled its
    production of ethanol--ethyl alcohol, a fuel distilled from plant
    matter--in the past decade, and Washington has just mandated another
    fivefold increase in renewable fuels over the next decade. Europe has
    similarly aggressive biofuel mandates and subsidies, and Brazil's
    filling stations no longer even offer plain gasoline. Worldwide
    investment in biofuels rose from $5 billion in 1995 to $38 billion in
    2005 and is expected to top $100 billion by 2010, thanks to investors
    like Richard Branson and George Soros, GE and BP, Ford and Shell,
    Cargill and the Carlyle Group. Renewable fuels has become one of those
    motherhood-and-apple-pie catchphrases, as unobjectionable as the troops
    or the middle class."

    Complete Article here.

    What's your answer to energy?

  • IF the world ends Summer 2008, this is why.

    ... say some people.

    "Walter L. Wagner and Luis Sancho contend that scientists at the
    European Center for Nuclear Research, or CERN, have played down the
    chances that the collider could produce, among other horrors, a tiny
    black hole, which, they say, could eat the Earth. Or it could spit out
    something called a “strangelet” that would convert our planet to a
    shrunken dense dead lump of something called “strange matter.” Their
    suit also says CERN has failed to provide an environmental impact
    statement as required under the National Environmental Policy Act."

    "The lawsuit, filed March 21 in Federal District Court, in Honolulu,
    seeks a temporary restraining order prohibiting CERN from proceeding
    with the accelerator until it has produced a safety report and an
    environmental assessment. It names the federal Department of Energy,
    the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, the National Science Foundation and CERN as defendants."

    -NY Times

    I find it ridiculous. But entertaining. Just how does a judge in Hawaii think he/she can prevent this $8 billion dollar project from going forward?

    Scott Adams puts it this way:

    "I don’t know how you ever get comfortable with any level of risk of
    destroying the universe. If you were to do an expected value
    calculation, multiplying the tiny risk times the potential cost, it
    would still come out infinitely expensive. [Anna's Note: hahahahha]

    And who exactly ran the numbers to decide it wasn’t that risky?
    After all, the whole point of the Large Hadron Collider is to create
    conditions that are not predictable. If someone already predicted what
    would happen using nothing but his laptop and Excel, and determined it
    was safe, I don’t think we’re getting our $8 billion worth.
    [Anna's Note: MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA]

    I can’t see the management of this project spending $8 billion,
    realizing it was a huge boner, and then holding a press conference
    suggesting it be turned into a parking garage. I’ll bet a lot of people
    in that position would take at least a 5% risk of incinerating the
    galaxy versus incinerating their own careers. I know I would.

    If the lawsuit succeeds, imagine trying to get another job with that project failure on your resume.

    Interviewer: “So, you spent $8 billion dollars trying to build a
    machine that would either discover something cool or destroy the
    universe. Is it fair to say you are not a people person?”"

    -Dilbert Blog

    More info/entertainment: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/27/823924.aspx

  • Hillary for President!

    To each her own.

    Nancy Pelosi's comment saying that "superdelegates" should support whoever has the most pledged delegates is absolutely ridiculous. >.< The whole POINT of being a superdelegate, as established by the party in 1984, is that he/should should be free to support whoever he/she wants.  If we listen to Pelosi, then we might as well abolish the unpledged delegate system.  Sheesh. Play by the rules! >.<

    James' Comment ~
    "I think the thesis for the
    superdelegate system is clear enough. A given career politician are in
    better position-- in terms of both experience and know-now-- to make
    political decisions than we are. It's not as if we're ceding the entire
    process of the primaries to the superdelgates. The superdelegates are
    just given additional weight: I don't remember the ratio, but it's
    something like one superdelegate = a few thousand regular votes.

    The superdelegate numbers are kept low enough that they would only
    make a difference in situations of a close race. A close race would
    indicate that the general voting population is rather undecided of
    their candidate. In the case of no clear winner, the superdelegates
    cast the deciding "ballot."

    Also note that the Democratic primaries don't employ a
    winner-take-all system. The votes are broken down to the level of
    congressional districts. If the superdelegate system=bad, then this
    district-level voting is good enough to make up."

    Posted 3/28/2008 8:53 AM by huginn - delete - block user - reply
  • for those of you who love documentaries...

    visit www.freedocumentaries.org

    They have:
    Sicko
    Bowling for Columbine
    Why We Fight
    Born into Brothels
    Wal-Mart
    Earthlings
    Invisible Children
    Iraq for Sale
    Life and Debt
    etc....

  • Happy Birthday, Honey! :-)

    Schubert's Cakes are yummy!

  • Who reads (and doesn't read)?


    Reading statistics here: http://www.parapublishing.com/sites/para/resources/statistics.cfm

    "70% of Americans haven't visited a bookstore in five (5) years."
    --Michael Levine, June 2002
    http://www.LevinPR.com

    Really? I go at least once a month... how is that possible?

    "One-third of high school graduates never read another book for the rest
    of their lives. Many people in the U.S. do not even graduate from high
    school.

    42% of college graduates never read another book.

    80% of US families did not buy or read a book last year."

    --Jerrold Jenkins.
    http://www.bookpublishing.com

    That's sad...

    "Only 32% of the U.S. population has ever been in a bookstore."
    --David Godine, Publisher.

    What?! 2/3 of the US population has NEVER been in a bookstore?

    I wouldn't vouch for the accuracy of these statements, but they're interesting nonetheless.